Students Dating College Professors

While relationships between students and professors arent unheard of, they can be a source for all kinds of problems. A professor is in a position of authority over a student, whether or not he or she is that students teacher or supervisor, which makes any dating arrangement tricky at best. Ultimately, if the two are consenting adults (theres no scenario where its OK for a high school teacher to date a current student), theres not much anyone can do to prevent them from pursuing a romantic relationship. But expect there to be consequences. Is It OK for College Students and Professors to Date? First things first: A student must be 18 years old to legally be able to consent to a relationship with an adult. Beyond that, some schools have specific rules about what to do if a student and a professor want to pursue a romantic relationship. If thats the case at your institution, know that the answer to your dating question lies in the faculty and/or student handbook. Breaking those rules could jeopardize the professors job and the students status. What to Do If Your School Has No Policy If youre at an institution where there arent official rules about dating, there are most likely some guidelines or unofficial community expectations. Is it frowned upon? Is it OK to date a professor, so long as youre not in one of his or her classes? Be aware that even if youre not breaking any rules, your relationship, and how its perceived could cause problems. Even if the professor isnt the students teacher when the relationship starts, problems could arise if the student ends up in the professors class later on. As a member of the faculty, the professor holds power over the student. Many schools discourage professor/student dating for these reasons. Additionally, other students may perceive a student dating a professor as having an unfair advantage. If youre dating a professor whose classes you take, students may think youre getting special treatment or grades you havent earned, no matter if you actually are. Say your professor/partner tutors you in a subject youre struggling with or helps you figure out which classes to take and get you the classes you need. From your perspective, youre just enjoying the benefits of a nice relationship. But its unfair to other students, who dont have the same access. A student dating a professor should be prepared for tension with peers, as they may envy the inside access to the faculty world. What If It Doesnt Work Out? Dating a professor can have tricky long-term consequences. If you break up, you may still have to see each other regularly around campus or, worse, in class. All those questions about fairness the relationship initially raised will remain, only the student may now be at a disadvantage, with his or her ex having power over grades and reputation with other faculty members. The student could potentially damage the professors reputation as well if he or she shares details of the relationship. Ultimately, you both need to consider the rules and have a discussion about the potential risks of a relationship. Be sure that its worth it because the costs could be severe.

Life at a Medieval University - 1406 Words

Life at a medieval university for clerics was in many regards similar to our present day college experience. When college was in session, life was basically split into two categories; life in the books, and life outside the books if you will. Scholars needed to focus their attention to the tasks at hand during learning hours. As we know today, the more time you spend studying, the better grades you’ll achieve. On the other hand, scholars needed a release from the daily grind of constant academic involvement. This may have included some popular pastimes such as drinking, gambling, and wreaking havoc downtown (nothing a modern student would do). The scholars experienced many of the problems that modern day collegians deal with as well.†¦show more content†¦If you were at a university at this time, you would follow the religious standards, just as I could never get out of going to Friday mass at HGA. Nowadays, religion is a touchy topic. It is left to the discret ion of the individual whether or not he or she wants to follow the practices and how closely. Church and state are now separated as to avoid major conflicts. Peter Abelard questions the theological teachings of medieval universities and is criticized for it. He says â€Å"Is God one, or no?† At this time scriptures were not to be questioned and were considered to be true. As we know now, science has become a major source of answers in society. Anyway, Abelard brings a whole new dimension to the table when he questions god’s existence and some of the things that the church stands for. The whole basis is to use logic and reason to ponder things in a philosophical fashion. This faith vs. reason debate involved Abelard and others who felt that god was in a persons being, or heart. Academia took up most of the students daily and weekly lives. Scholars took full advantage of down time to relax and enjoy themselves. Social life was the second major aspect of a cler ic’s university experience. As we know, the student body greatly impacts the surrounding town’s economy; however social issues arise as well. When students and townspeople are in the same atmosphere, and drinking, fights are bound to break lose. These battles came to be knownShow MoreRelatedDaily Life During The Middle Ages1076 Words   |  5 PagesDaily life during the Middle Ages is sometimes hard to fathom. Pop culture loves to focus on exciting medieval moments-heroic knights charging into battle; romantic liaisons between royalty and commoner; breakthroughs and discoveries made. But life for your average person during the Dark Ages was very routine, and activities revolved around an agrarian calendar. Most of the time was spent working the land, and trying to grow enough food to survive another year. Church feasts marked sowing and reapingRead MoreThe Impact Of Medieval Europe On Education1286 Words   |  6 Pagesworkforce. Either choice has endless possibilities, and a lot of freedom for the student to pick. The importance of education is found in many cultures, but where did it all begin? Medieval Europe started many ideals about education that would have a powerful effect on many different forms of education around the world. Medieval Europe birthed the very first institutions in which students could collectively learn the same information. While the institutions and the importance of education was growingRead MoreEssay on Universities Medieval And Mode675 Words   |  3 Pages Universities: Medieval and Modern nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; Universities have existed since the Twelfth Century AD and have been evolving ever since. There have been many changes however many things have remained unchanged throughout the years. The student and teacher roles have evolved as well as the general purpose of going to a university. Overall the academic aspects have changed more than the personal aspects of college. In 1200, the King of France issued a statement (118)* regardingRead MoreThe Evolution Of Education From Socrates, Plato And Aristotle To Medieval Europe753 Words   |  4 PagesEducation has changed over the years from Socrates, Plato and Aristotle to medieval Europe to even the twenty first century. When comparing the intended students then and the classes that were offered to them are vastly different than the intended students and classes that are offered now. Even the instructors are different from who can teach then to who can teach now. In ancient Greece, there were Sophist who were a group of philosophical teachers in the fifth century BCE. There were three mainRead MoreEssay on Jewish Women in Medieval Ashkenaz1547 Words   |  7 Pages Medieval Jewish society, like all traditional Jewish culture, was run by patriarchal hierarchy â€Å"Philosophical, medical, and religious views of the time all supported the view that men were superior to women both in nature and in deed† . Women’s position in society was secondary in comparison to that of men. They were characterized as lightheaded, weak, easily seduced, and linked to sorcery. This essay will focus on the Jewish women living in the medieval society of Ashkenaz, a region of northernRead MorePolitics And City Of God : Issues And Medieval Political Thought Essay1717 Words   |  7 PagesPolitics in Augustinian City of God: Issues in Medieval Political Thought By Okechukwu S. Amadi Department of Political Administrative Studies University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria E-mail: okechukwu.amadi@uniport.edu.ng Abstract In this paper we have attempted to show the significance of St. Augustine’s thought on the problems of politics as contained in his famous work The City of God. We established that his theoretical enterprise on politics and State based as it were on theRead MoreSimilarities Between Medieval Japan And Medieval Europe812 Words   |  4 PagesComparison Essay- Shogunate Japan and Medieval Europe When people think of â€Å"Medieval†, they often relate this to Europe. However, there was once a Medieval Japan too, and this time stretched from 1185-1868 CE. During this period, Shoguns ruled Japan, and they defined it as â€Å"Medieval† because, just like Europe society in Japan at this time was feudal in structure. Medieval Europe lasted from the 5th to the 15th century, and was often referred to as Christendom, because most civilians were ChristiansRead MoreMiddle Ages as the Age of Faith Essay893 Words   |  4 PagesMiddle Ages as the Age of Faith The Middle Ages is often referred to as the Age of Faith and it is correct to do so, as during this period religion dominated all aspects of life from architecture, literature, art and music. The dominant religion during this period was Christianity. The middle ages saw the emergence #8230; of Christian literary forms#8230; a popular religious culture centred around processions, icons, and relics (George Holmes 42). The crusades were wars fought in theRead MoreEssay about Christendom and The Song of Roland1119 Words   |  5 Pagesanonymous poet, composed in between late eleven century to twelfth century. This epic poetry holds an important place in the history of France and invention of Christendom. The Song of Roland is a cultural artifact that takes us to the journey of Medieval Europe, when religion becomes an important element for the formation of proto-Europe. Religion plays a crucial role in The Song of Roland and becomes the reason of criticism. Some readers might take this poem as a religious text, whereas, for someRead MoreThe Author of the Black Death: John Aberth Essay828 Words   |  4 Pagesother colleges in Vermont, including the University of Vermont. In 1992, John Aberth received his Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge in Medieval Studies after he received his masters from the University of Leeds. He is the author of five books, whose main focus is the effects of the Black Death in the later Middle Ages, including The First Horsemen: Disease in Human History, The Black Death: The Great Mortality of 1348-1350, and A Knight at the Movies: Medieval History on Film. Published in 2001

Chaucers the House Of Fame The Cultural Nature Essay Example For Students

Chaucers the House Of Fame: The Cultural Nature Essay Chaucers the House Of Fame: The Cultural Nature Of FameChaucers The House of Fame: The Cultural Nature of FameQUESTION 7. DISCUSS THE CULTURAL NATURE OF FAME AND ITS TEXTUAL EXPRESSION WITH REFERENCE TOONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: ORAL HEROIC POETRY, CHAUCERS DEPICTION IN THEHOUSE OF FAME AND THE MODERN CONSTRUCTION OF THE CANON OF ENGLISH LITERATURE. YOU SHOULD FOCUS YOUR ANALYSIS ON THE INTERPLAY OF ORAL AND LITERARY TRADITIONSIN THESE CONTEXTS. Many critics have noted the complexities within Chaucers The House of Fame,in particular, the complexities between the oral and the literary. Thedifferences between these methods are constantly appearing; Chaucer is wellaware of rapidly changing communicative practises and contrasts the preservationof utterance with the longevity of literary texts. He achieves this bydiscussing the nature of Fame and the difficulties that arise from it. Famecan both destroy and create. It can result in the eternal preservation of greatworks and their creators. However, Chaucer is quick to note the precariousnature of fame noting the unreliable process of attaining it and itspotentially momentary existence. Every creator with their respective work/snaturally crave and desire fame; they want their subjects to remain fresh inthe minds of their audience. Chaucer, while neither totally praising the writtennor the oral, reveals how essentially the written word is far more likely tobecome eternal as opposed to the oral. The relative fame of any work isdependent on many factors. Many traditional and classical ideas result in theformation of the English canon, yet as Chaucer indicates, the fame of theseworks can easily become annihilated. The arrival of new readers with differentideals and thereby changing tradition, can reject classical or canonical workand their fame will melt into nothingness. Most stories, histories and legends that emerge from oral heroic poetry areto herald the achievement of the powerful and wealthy so that their historieswill not fade from the memories of the population. The stories of Beowolf are aclear example of this, as within these stories, (whether embellished or no),Beowolfs fame and legend reaches the modern reader hundreds of years later. Clearly, Beowolf is still very much dependant on the conventions of oraltraditions and written to leave a permanent reminder of Beowolf, to enforceBeowolfs fame. The use of Hwaet to mark the start of an oration, emphasisesthe continuation of oral tradition. Most oral cultures (usually illiterate),pass on stories and legends learnt from the previous generation, basically usingthe authority of recalled memory, not as an actual witness; rather I have heardit said than I know this to be true. The importance of the terms auctor and auctoritas is noted by A.J. Minnis. Minnis states the importance of the auctoritas, quoting Aristotle whodefines this as the judgement of the wise man in his chosen discipline. Thegreat reverence and respect shown towards writers of antiquity is clearlyevident in Chaucers The House of Fame, yet there remains a definiteinconsistency within Chaucers work. While Chaucer is clearly familiar with manyclassical writers and their works, such as; Virgils Aeneid, several works ofOvid , Boccacio and Dante, Chaucers work raises several questions about theclassical writers, the nature of written texts and the complexities of fame. The term fame had a myriad of meanings in Middle English, it could meanreputation, renown, or rumour. Chaucer plays on all these meanings and itsimplications, yet his ideas are clouded and obscured so it is difficult todefine whether his arguments are mocking, condemning or celebrating. J. Stephenagrees with Shelia Delanys argument in her book, The House of Fame: The Poeticsof Skeptical Fidelism and believes that The House of Fame is indeed asceptical poem. However, Russell is rather extreme in his view, believing thatChaucer is writing to deconstruct the tyranny of the written word. It isdifficult to agree with this view, and although there are elements to suggestthis may be the case, one would tend to agree with Delanys argument, thatChaucer preferred to transcend the choice between traditions rather than tocommit himself whole heartedly to a single intellectual position or a consistentpoint of view. Chaucer, in his description of Virgils Aeneid decides to alter the eventswithin Virgils narrative. There is always the problem of what can be consideredtrue,the problems of authenticity and originality remain. These great writersthat Chaucer often references, like Virgil, Ovid, Boccacio, Boethius and Danteare auctors who carry great weight and authority, yet , as this is Geffreysdream he is able to manipulate the events within The House of Fame. Thus Geffreyhas the power of both the oral and written auctor, he has heard the storiesbefore, (in Ovid and Virgil) yet can retell these events to the reader withperhaps even more auctoritas as he can also state to the reader that I wasthere so I can tell you the truth. However, Chaucers auctoritas isdiminished because even though he was an actual witness, it was still a dream, ahazy and unpredictable area which can neither be totally rejected nor believedand accepted. These implications show that Chaucer was perhaps rejecting theauctoritas o f these writers, revealing the possible discrepancies within anytext, written or oral, and how narrative events are able to change depending onthe reliability of the auctor. The mocking of Geffrey and his scholarly lifeand ambitions would also indicate Chaucers dislike of the scholarly andacademic world of the 14th century. Geffrey is caricatured as a book-worm,unable to comprehend events outside the world of books. The Eagle speaks toGeffrey of the futility and emptiness of a scholar ; Thou goost hom to thy housanoon,/And, also domb as any stoon,/Thou sittest at another book/Tyl fullydaswed ys thy look;/And lyvest thus as an heremyte,/Although thyn abstynence yslyte. (655-660) During the Eagles impressive monologue the intelligentGeffrey can only answer in rather dull-witted monosyllables; Gladly,Noo?why?, Yis and Wel. Geffrey is also portrayed as a rather weak and stupidfellow, despite his scholarly habits. When one compares him to the classicalheroes of classical mythology, he re alises that he is a mere mortal and afraid;Oh God, thoughte I, that madest kynde,/Shal I noon other weyes dye?. Unlikethe heroes of old, Geffrey is aware that he is no brave hero; nether am Ennock,ne Elye,/Ne Romulus, ne Ganymede. (557-558) Despite these negativerepresentations, there still remains elements of respect and awe towardsclassical writings and the strong belief entrusted in these works as containedin the line, In certeyn, as the book us tellis. (426) The same respect isreflected in a speech made by the Eagle to Geffrey; Loo, this sentence ysknowen kouth/ Of every philosophres mouth,/ As Aristotle and daun Platon,/ Andother clerkys many oon;/ And to confirme my resoun,/Thou wost wel this, thatspech is soun, (757-762) It seems as though Chaucer is exploring both elementsof what is the true auctor and questions the idea of auctoritas. Weathering, Erosion, and Deposition.The spoken word is carried away in the wind, the constant mutterings oftenforgotten whereas the written word has endured for many hundreds of years. Clearly Chaucer has mixed feelings toward the power of literacy and orality. Both can be enduring, but in an increasingly more literate society, the use oforality to immortalise narrative events is rarely used. As Chaucer indicates,the written word does remain in The House of Fame whereas the spoken word ismore likely contained within the constantly changing murmurings in The House ofRumour. However, although Chaucer is himself a scholarly and academic man likeGeffrey, he is still rather mocking of the academic society and the scholars whoseem to be permaently fixed within the world of literature and relying entirelyon book-learning, rather than experiences from the events in the outside worldof reality. Chaucer within his description of The House of Fame also questionsthe relevance of literary works, proving that the fame of authors and theirworks is a tenative one. Chaucer is clearly reveals the beginnings of theEnglish canon and the works contained within it. He stresses the fluctuations offame and how works can become a part an elite grouping. The modern readerknows, that the books within the English canon may gradually disappear or canreemerge, depending on the attitudes of people like Geffrey, the readers andscholars, and of institutions that continually study the classical texts. According to Chaucer, fame is not considered a noble accomplishment and theresult of chance rather than any literatary merit or virtue.